Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2 9B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Version | gemma-2-27b | gemma-2-9b |
| Release Date | 2024-06-27 | 2024-06-27 |
| Context Window | 8192 tokens | 8192 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Gemma License | Gemma License |
| SOC2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.1 | 90.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| BBH | 71.2 | 66.7 | Gemma 2 27B |
| GPQA | 35.4 | 30.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| GSM8K | 77.4 | 64.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| HUMANEVAL | 72.4 | 60.9 | Gemma 2 27B |
| IFEVAL | 72.5 | 64.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| MATH | 35.5 | 28.9 | Gemma 2 27B |
| MMLU | 77.4 | 64.3 | Gemma 2 27B |
| MUSR | 53 | 44.1 | Gemma 2 27B |
| WINOGRANDE | 80.5 | 72.5 | Gemma 2 27B |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.7 | $0.3 |
| Output | $0.7 | $0.3 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Gemma 2 27B đối Gemma 2 9B
Tổng quan mô hình
Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Thông số kỹ thuật chính
| Nhà cung cấp | Ngày phát hành | Cửa sổ ngữ cảnh | Giấy phép |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google / Google | 2024-06-27 / 2024-06-27 | 8K / 8K | Gemma License / Gemma License |
Hiệu suất benchmark
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B | Người chiến thắng |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.1 | 90.3 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 71.2 | 66.7 | A |
| GPQA | 35.4 | 30.3 | A |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 77.4 | 64.3 | A |
| HumanEval | 72.4 | 60.9 | A |
| IFEval | 72.5 | 64.3 | A |
| MATH | 35.5 | 28.9 | A |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 77.4 | 64.3 | A |
| MUSR | 53.0 | 44.1 | A |
| WinoGrande | 80.5 | 72.5 | A |
So sánh giá
| Đầu vào | Đầu ra | Đọc bộ nhớ đệm | Ghi bộ nhớ đệm |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
mỗi triệu token — A / B
Điểm mạnh & Điểm yếu
Gemma 2 27B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
- ⚠️ 上下文窗口 8K 偏小。
Gemma 2 9B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
- ⚠️ 上下文窗口 8K 偏小。
Ý kiến biên tập
Gemma 2 27B and Gemma 2 9B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
Tham chiếu
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.