Key Specifications

SpecificationLlama 3.1 405BMixtral 8x22B
Vendormetamistral
Version3.1-405b8x22b
Release Date2024-07-232024-04-10
Context Window128000 tokens64000 tokens
Input Modalitiestexttext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseLlama 3 Community LicenseApache 2.0
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BMixtral 8x22BWinner
BBH82.974.5Llama 3.1 405B
GSM8K89.278.6Llama 3.1 405B
HUMANEVAL8945.2Llama 3.1 405B
MATH73.846Llama 3.1 405B
MMLU88.677.8Llama 3.1 405B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Llama 3.1 405BMixtral 8x22B
Input$5$1.2
Output$15$1.2
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Llama 3.1 405B đối Mixtral 8x22B

Tổng quan mô hình

Llama 3.1 405B and Mixtral 8x22B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Thông số kỹ thuật chính

Nhà cung cấpNgày phát hànhCửa sổ ngữ cảnhGiấy phép
Meta / Mistral2024-07-23 / 2024-04-10128K / 64KLlama 3 Community License / Apache 2.0

Hiệu suất benchmark

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 405BMixtral 8x22BNgười chiến thắng
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)82.974.5A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)89.278.6A
HumanEval89.045.2A
MATH73.846.0A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)88.677.8A

So sánh giá

Đầu vàoĐầu raĐọc bộ nhớ đệmGhi bộ nhớ đệm
— / —— / —— / —— / —

mỗi triệu token — A / B

Điểm mạnh & Điểm yếu

Llama 3.1 405B

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.6, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 89.0, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 89.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Mixtral 8x22B

  • ✅ 采用 MoE 混合专家架构。
  • ⚠️ HumanEval 45.2,代码能力较弱。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Ý kiến biên tập

Llama 3.1 405B and Mixtral 8x22B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Tham chiếu

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.